kennedylawblog

Author Archives: kennedylawblog
- Paths to Citizenship
  
  Posted at 9:18 pm by kennedylawblog, on August 15, 2019
  How can a child under the age of 18 become a U.S citizen?
  
  Because the process of naturalization requires the applicant to be 18 years of age or older, minor children cannot apply for citizenship like their parents. However, in most cases, children under age 18 are not required to apply for citizenship, instead it will be granted to them automatically when one of their parents becomes a citizen or if specific requirements are met.
  
  The laws that concerned acquiring derivative citizenship by children under age 18 were expanded and the requirements relaxed in the Child Citizenship Act of 2000. This law states that if a child under the age of 18 meets the following three requirements, they will be granted citizenship. The requirements are as follows:
  1. At least one of the child’s parent must be a citizen of the U.S. by naturalization or birth.
  2. The minor child must be a green card holder.
  3. The minor child must be living in the United States in the custody of a parent that is a U.S. citizen.
  After all the requirements have been met, the child will automatically become a U.S. citizen, without the need to file any applications.
  
  Obtaining U.S. Citizenship Through Marriage
  
  In the United States, under U.S. immigration laws, green card holders can apply for citizenship through marriage to become citizens after three years in the U.S. rather than having to live in the United States for fives years before applying, like most permanent residents. There are requirements that you must meet, before your spouse, who must be a U.S. citizen, can file for your naturalization. The requirements are as follows:
  1. You must be a green card holder.
  2. You must be over the age of 18.
  3. You must be living with your spouse for at least 3 years before filing for citizenship.
  4. You must stay married to your spouse up until you have taken your Oath of Allegiance at your citizenship ceremony.
  5. You must have been continuously living in the United States as a green card holder for three years or more, before filing for citizenship. For those three years you must have been physically in the United States for 18 months or more.
  6. You must be able to speak, read, and write in English.
  7. You must show that you have knowledge and understanding of U.S. history and government.
  8. You must show that you have filed and are current on your taxes for the past 3 years.
  9. You must show that you have good moral character for the three years before filing for citizenship.
    - What is good moral character?
      A person with good moral character is a law-abiding person who respects and follows the laws and rules of their community and country.
  With recent developments, like the Trump administration’s new rule regarding grounds of inadmissibility, making it more difficult for low-income immigrants to legally immigrate to the United States, obtaining citizenship is becoming more and more difficult. However, with the help of an experienced immigration attorney the path to citizenship can be made much more manageable.
  
  This is an immigration legal blog. It is not intended to be used as legal advice. For further information please contact the law offices of attorney Ramona Kennedy.
  
  Ramona Kennedy (Attorney) received her Jurisprudence Doctorate in America and is a licensed attorney in California (USA). Ramona Kennedy is a member of American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). Ramona Kennedy is fluent in English and Farsi (reading & writing) & speaks Azeri Turkish.
  
  Email: kennedycounsel@gmail.com
  
  Phones: 13106230080 & 19496770063
  
  Imo: 13106230080 & 19496770063
  
  Telegram & WhatsApp: 19496770063
  
  Office Locations:
  
  Los Angeles (Westwood) Location
  
  -Openheimer tower
  
  10880 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1101 Los Angeles CA 90024
  
  Phone: 13106230080
  
  Orange County Locations:
  
  Irvine:
  
  -7700 Irvine Center Dr. Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92618
  
  Newport Beach:
  
  -5000 Birch St, Suite 3000 Newport Beach CA 92660
  
  Phone: 19496770063
  Posted in Citizenship | 0 Comments | Tagged #citizenship, #farsispeakinglawyer, #greencard, #greencardlawyer, #groundsofinadmissibility, #immigrationlawyer
- Why Delist from OFAC Blocked List? Financial institutions listed in Designated Block List of US department of Treasury, OFAC List may potentially be charged with Conspiracy as they have facilitated prohibited acts or criminal actions threatening US security.
  
  Posted at 11:52 pm by kennedylawblog, on August 5, 2019
  
  Conspiracy happens when two or more individuals make an agreement to commit a crime and intend to follow through. To be charged with conspiracy, the criminal act need not have actually taken place, there must have just been steps taken toward its completion.
  A conspirator may be charged for the same crimes as main perpetrator has committed. This is the reason why those that help and abate governments who violate human rights or US sanction laws in any form, such as financially may also be charged with the same crimes as their government has been.
  For example the Department of Treasury just updated their list of “designated Blocked Persons”. Among those name listed you will find Iranian Supreme or Iranian foreign minister ( Mohammad Javad Zarif) who has been added to the list as of 12:30 PM, Pacific Time July of 31th, 2019. The foreign minister was present in NY at the time he has been entered to the list. His movements throughout the city has been limited to routs taken to commute into and out of his hotel and United Nations Building.
  For an Updated list of specially designated nationals (OFAC), you may search the website of US Department of treasury.
  At the same time, and depending on his type of involvement , a financial supporter or a banking institute may help a government to fund humanitarian needs such as medicine, food, etc.
  Iranian government has for years tried to create highly sophisticated financial loopholes to survive US sanctions.
  That is why , our office receives a call from a financial institution located in countries other than Iran and they are in designated list with high alerts.
  Some pseudo militia groups and even some governments affiliated agencies, contractors, whether officially related or not may commit crimes that are defined by US laws as crimes against US Properties, for example :Aircraft Piracy and Related Offenses (49 U.S.C. §§ 46501-07): which is a federal crime to seize any aircraft when it is within the United States’ jurisdiction. It is also illegal to interfere with members of the aircraft’s crew, to carry concealed weapons or explosives of any kind onto an aircraft, or to commit violent crimes such as homicide, robbery, or manslaughter while on an aircraft. All military and civilian aircrafts that belong to the United States’ or its citizens are under the U.S.’ jurisdiction anywhere in the world while they are in flight.
  Or they may commit Crimes Against Immediate Family of All Federal Officials (18 U.S.C. § 115)
  “(1)Whoever
  (A) assaults, kidnaps, or murders, or attempts or conspires to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap or murder a member of the immediate family of a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under section 1114 of this title; or
  (B) threatens to assault, kidnap, or murder, a United States official, a United States judge, a Federal law enforcement officer, or an official whose killing would be a crime under such section, with intent to impede, intimidate, or interfere with such official, judge, or law enforcement officer while engaged in the performance of official duties, or with intent to retaliate against such official, judge, or law enforcement officer on account of the performance of official duties, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b). (2) Whoever assaults, kidnaps, or murders, or attempts or conspires to kidnap or murder, or threatens to assault, kidnap, or murder, any person who formerly served as a person designated in paragraph (1), or a member of the immediate family of any person who formerly served as a person designated in paragraph (1), with intent to retaliate against such person on account of the performance of official duties during the term of service of such person, shall be punished.
  This includes “United States official” which means the President, President-elect, Vice President, Vice President-elect, a Member of Congress, a member-elect of Congress, a member of the executive branch who is the head of a department listed in 5 U.S.C. 101, or the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.”
  Among other crimes against US may be Murder-for-hire. Jihadists, their helpers and financiers may be conspirators to Murder-for-Hire (18 U.S.C. § 1958), which is defined as:
  “Whoever travels in or causes another (including the intended victim) to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or uses or causes another (including the intended victim) to use the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, with intent that a murder be committed in violation of the laws of any State or the United States as consideration for the receipt of, or as consideration for a promise or agreement to pay, anything of pecuniary value, or who conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than ten years, or both; and if personal injury results, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than twenty years, or both; and if death results, shall be punished by death or life imprisonment, or shall be fined not more than $250,000, or both.”
  Hostage taking is another familiar situation which may happen on or about US embassies, consulates or even a simple culture group associated with America in foreign land.
  Hostage Taking (18 U.S.C. § 1203):
  “in 1984, Congress enacted the hostage taking statute to implement the International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages. The statute became effective on January 6, 1985. Hostage taking is defined as the seizing or detention of an individual coupled with a threat to kill, injure or continue to detain such individual in order to compel a third person or governmental organization to take some action. The United States has jurisdiction over the taking of hostages outside the United States (a) if the perpetrator or a hostage is a United States national, (b) if the perpetrator is found in the United States regardless of his nationality, or (c) if the United States is the Government coerced by the hostage taker. See JM 9-60.700, et seq.”
  Among other crimes that a financial institution abroad may be charged with is terrorism against United States Citizens who are present abroad :
  Terrorist Acts Abroad Against United States Nationals (18 U.S.C. § 2332)
  “On August 28, 1986, the President signed Public Law No. 99-399, the Omnibus Diplomatic Security and Anti-terrorism Act of 1986. Section 1202 of the Act created a new section 2331 of Title 18, U.S.C., (now codified as 18 U.S.C. § 2332) which makes it a Federal crime for a terrorist overseas to kill a United States national, attempt to murder a United States national, conspire to murder a United States national, or to engage in physical violence with the intent to cause serious bodily injury to a United States national or with the result that serious bodily injury is caused to a United States national. Prosecution for any offense under § 2332 requires the written certification of the Attorney General, or the highest ranking subordinate of the Attorney General with responsibility for criminal prosecutions, that, in the judgment of that official, the offense was intended to coerce, intimidate, or retaliate against a government or a civilian population.”
  One may think with the laws that have been enacted by the US, anyone can be persecuted. Or any financial institution that has even had minor dealing with nationals of the government that is acting adverse to the United States benefits may cause implications.
  The truth of the matter is YES, the laws potentially covers many areas and may insert jurisdictions throughout the globe. However the laws have not always been practiced unfairly or there is not always the involvement of abuse of discretion.
  Abuse of discretion is not widely used by US Government agencies. Therefore there is always room for defense, especially when a financial institution hires a good attorney that would help to clarify facts and allows US government to delist the name of the institution from “designated Blocked List” or hires a good criminal defense attorney, familiarized with the subject and specialized in the field to help defense of financial international crime or conspiracy charges and establish that the financial institutions are indeed innocent or they have unknowingly committed an act which is incidental to reasonable practice which has brought them results they didn’t intend.
  The US agencies have broad discretion is persecution of financial institution, one of the charges that may be brought against them as conspirators are under the law that protect US beyond the US boundaries. And that is :
  Terrorism Transcending National Boundaries (18 U.S.C. § 2332b).
  “Section 2332b of Title 18, U.S.C., effective April 24, 1996, was enacted as part of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. 104-132, § 702, 110 Stat. 1214, 1291. Section 2332b is intended to reach violent international terrorist activity that takes place within the United States where at least a part of that activity also occurs outside the United States.
  The violent conduct can be targeted against persons or property within the United States. The statute covers such conduct when it violates either Federal or state law. It sets forth a wide spectrum of bases to assert Federal jurisdiction. It provides for consecutive punishment in addition to any other Federal offense that was committed. Subsection § 2332b(e) also gives the Attorney General (i.e., the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)) primary investigative authority for all “Federal crimes of terrorism” as that term is defined in § 2332b(f).”
  The financial institutions are a means or a media for financial supports of a group or a company that may work as a peaceful legitimate business but in reality they advance prohibited goals. Therefore financial institutions may be perceived as conspirators under 18 USC § 2339A which states as follow:
  Providing Material Support to Terrorists (18 U.S.C. § 2339A)
  “The Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 amended 18 U.S.C. § 2339A to expand its list of terrorist type offenses. See Pub. L. 104-132, § 323, 110 Stat. 1214, 1255. Section 2339A, originally enacted on September 13, 1994, is primarily a statute aimed at reaching those persons who provide material support to terrorists knowing that such support will be used to commit one of the offenses specified in the statute. (The offenses specified in the statute are: 18 U.S.C. §§ 32, 37, 81, 175, 351, 831, 842(m) or
  (n), 844(f) or (i), 956, 1114, 1116, 1203, 1361, 1362, 1363, 1366, 1751, 2155, 2156, 2280, 2281, 2332, 2332a, 2332b, or 2340A and 49 U.S.C. § 46502.) The section requires only that the supplier of the material support have knowledge of its intended use. Section 2339A, unlike the aiding and abetting statute (18 U.S.C. § 2), does not require that the supplier also have whatever specific intent the perpetrator of the actual terrorist act must have to commit one of the specified offenses. The 1996 amendment also eliminated former subsection 2339A(c) which had imposed unworkable investigative restrictions upon the statute’s utilization.”
  The high level alert of an individual or financial institutions listed in designated blocked list might be due to the foreign governments involvement of the weapons that are rigorously dangerous to the survival of human race. Under the following law, any financial agency that helps to advance a government or group that is involved maybe charged with conspiracy.
  Use of Biological, Nuclear, Chemical or Other Weapons of Mass Destruction (18 U.S.C. § § 175, 831, 2332c, 2332a).
  “In recent years, terrorists have used in increasing numbers weapons of mass destruction against civilian populations and non-combatant military personnel. Examples of such terrorist activities include: the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center in New York City; the 1995 bombing of the Federal building in Oklahoma City; the 1995 attacks against the Tokyo subway system with poison gas; and the 1996 bombing of United States military housing in Saudi Arabia.
  Over the past decade, Congress has enacted a number of statutes that provide criminal jurisdiction over the use of biological (§ 175), chemical (§ 2332c), nuclear (§ 831), and other weapons of mass destruction (§ 2332a). All of these statutes cover the use and threatened use of such weapons of mass destruction committed within the United States. In addition, there is extraterritorial jurisdiction whenever the perpetrator of the offense is a national of the United States, or a United States national, including property of the United States Government in most instances, is a victim of the offense.”
  And last but not lease, a financial institution maybe enlisted as high alert institution for violation of human rights, just because they have directly or remotely financed some investments of the government or group that are guilty of such allegations. The convention against torture by United Nations High Commissioner and United States laws stringently prohibits torture and defines as followed.
  Torture (18 U.S.C. § 2340A)
  “Section 2340A of Title 18, United States Code, prohibits torture committed by public officials under color of law against persons within the public official’s custody or control. Torture is defined to include acts specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering. (It does not include such pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions.) The statute applies only to acts of torture committed outside the United States. There is Federal extraterritorial jurisdiction over such acts whenever the perpetrator is a national of the United States or the alleged offender is found within the United States, irrespective of the nationality of the victim or the alleged offender.”
  If you are enlisted in the designated block list of OFAC , department of treasury , you are highly advised to discuss your terms of delisting with an OFAC lawyer.
  
  This is an immigration legal blog. It is not intended to be used as legal advice. For further information please contact the law offices of attorney Ramona Kennedy.
  Ramona Kennedy (Attorney) received her Jurisprudence Doctorate in America and is a licensed attorney in California (USA). Ramona Kennedy is a member of American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). Ramona Kennedy is fluent in English and Farsi (reading & writing) & speaks Azeri Turkish.
  
  Email: kennedycounsel@gmail.com
  Phones: 13106230080 & 19496770063
  Imo: 13106230080 & 19496770063
  Telegram & WhatsApp: 19496770063
  
  Office Locations:
  Los Angeles (Westwood) Location
  -Oppenheimer tower
  10880 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1101 Los Angeles CA 90024
  Phone: 13106230080
  
  Orange County Locations:
  Irvine:
  -7700 Irvine Center Dr. Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92618
  Newport Beach:
  -5000 Birch St, Suite 3000 Newport Beach CA 92660
  
  Posted in OFAC | 0 Comments | Tagged #businesslawyer, #farsispeakinglawyer, #ofaclawyer
- Calculating the Amount Needed for Investment in U.S. EB-5 Green Cards
  
  Posted at 10:09 pm by kennedylawblog, on July 31, 2019
  One of the requirements for the EB-5 visa is capital investment. Capital can be cash, equipment related to your business, the inventory of your business, properties, among other things.
  
  It should be said that any assets that you have obtained, through direct or indirect means, that are found to have been created through illegal activities will not be counted as capital for your EB-5 visa. You must be able to demonstrate that you legally own all of the capital that you are investing.
  
  The investment amount requirements are as follows:
  1. If you are filing before Nov. 21, 2019, the minimum required investment is $1,000,000. If you are filing after Nov. 21, 2019, the minimum required investment will be $1,800,000.
  2. If you are filing before Nov. 21, 2019, and you are investing in a Targeted Employment Area (or TEA) then the minimum required investment is $500,000. If you are filing after Nov. 21, 2019 and you are investing in a Targeted Employment Area (TEA) then the minimum required investment will be $900,000
  What is a TEA, or Targeted Employment Area?
  
  A targeted employment area can be either a rural area or a place that has a high rate of unemployment, which is said to be 150% the national average or higher.
  
  A high unemployment area can be situated in any of the following places, as long as the area’s rate of unemployment is at least 150% of the national average:
  1. An MSA, which is a metropolitan statistical area (the definition of which is set forth by the Office of Management and Budget).
  2. A county within a metropolitan statistical area (MSA).
  3. Any county that has a city with a population over 20,000.
  This is an immigration legal blog. It is not intended to be used as legal advice. For further information please contact the law offices of attorney Ramona Kennedy.
  
  Ramona Kennedy (Attorney) received her Jurisprudence Doctorate in America and is a licensed attorney in California (USA). Ramona Kennedy is a member of American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). Ramona Kennedy is fluent in English and Farsi (reading & writing) & speaks Azeri Turkish.
  
  Email: kennedycounsel@gmail.com
  
  Phones: 13106230080 & 19496770063
  
  Imo: 13106230080 & 19496770063
  
  Telegram & WhatsApp: 19496770063
  
  Office Locations:
  
  Los Angeles (Westwood) Location
  
  -Oppenheimer tower
  
  10880 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1101 Los Angeles CA 90024
  
  Phone: 13106230080
  
  Orange County Locations:
  
  Irvine:
  
  -7700 Irvine Center Dr. Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92618
  
  Newport Beach:
  
  -5000 Birch St, Suite 3000 Newport Beach CA 92660
  
  Phone: 19496770063
  Posted in EB-5 Visas | 0 Comments | Tagged #businessimmigration, #businesslawyer, #farsispeakinglawyer, #greencard, #immigrationlawyer, #investmentvisa
- Why interests acquired under Duress in California are reversible?
  
  Posted at 10:13 pm by kennedylawblog, on July 29, 2019
  Definition of Economic Duress: An illicit act that is adequately coercive to induce a “reasonably prudent person” to yield to the pressure applied by the perpetrator because they lack an acceptable alternative.
  
  Illicit Acts: These acts may be any of the following, blackmail, knowingly making a false claim, or issuing a bad faith threat to begin civil legal proceedings along with many others.
  
  What Are Acceptable Alternatives?
  
  Determining whether or not there was an acceptable alternative in the context of the situation in which there was claimed to be economic duress is based upon an objective standard; the determination is based upon whether a reasonably prudent person would have followed an alternative course in the situation.
  
  Where the term economic duress is applied?
  
  Economic duress is a form of duress that is less known, but one that can be claimed and used in business litigation matters. An example in which economic duress could be claimed would be if, during a negotiation, one party would be forced to forfeit all of their assets if they did not acquiesce to the contract or agreement.
  
  Currently, the doctrine of economic duress does not require the person to have committed a crime or a tort in order to be considered economic duress. The doctrine is used to rectify wrongs that are committed in the business world that are not caught and rectified through other regulatory avenues.
  
  While the doctrine of economic duress bears some similarities to the general doctrine of duress, undue influence, and menace there are small, but important, differences that separate them from one another.
  
  The General Doctrine of Duress:
  - This doctrine refers to an illegal action taken by a party by which another’s consent is forcibly obtained via threats or the instillation of fear through other means. While the doctrine of economic duress includes financial consequences, the general doctrine of duress often includes threats of confining the person, the illegal detention of the person or their property, or the legal detention of a person via fraudulent means.
  Undue Influence:
  - Undue influence is marked by using one’s real or assumed authority over another to gain an unfair advantage, by taking unfair advantage of another’s fragile mental state, or by being extremely oppressive in taking unfair advantage of another person’s state of distress. Undue influence bears resemblance to the doctrine of economic duress, but the latter is more narrow in its use, because it only includes financial matters.
  Menace:
  - In California menace refers to a threat of violence against the person or their property, or to defame the person’s character. Cases of menace usually include physical threats.
  This is a civil litigation law blog. It is not intended to be used as legal advice. For further information please contact the law offices of attorney Ramona Kennedy.
  
  Ramona Kennedy (Attorney) received her Jurisprudence Doctorate and is a licensed attorney in California (USA).
  
  Email: kennedycounsel@gmail.com
  
  Phones: 13106230080 & 19496770063
  
  Imo: 13106230080 & 19496770063
  
  Telegram & WhatsApp: 19496770063
  
  Office Locations:
  
  Los Angeles (Westwood) Location
  
  -Oppenheimer tower
  
  10880 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1101 Los Angeles CA 90024
  
  Phone: 13106230080
  
  Orange County Locations:
  
  Irvine:
  
  -7700 Irvine Center Dr. Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92618
  
  Newport Beach:
  
  -5000 Birch St, Suite 3000 Newport Beach CA 92660
  
  Phone: 19496770063
  Posted in Business Law Blogs | 0 Comments
- Understanding OFAC
  
  Posted at 10:52 pm by kennedylawblog, on July 24, 2019
  
  OFAC, the Office of Foreign Asset Control, is part of the United States Treasury department that enforces economic sanctions against countries, organizations, and people that are involved, or believed to be involved in terrorism, the trafficking of narcotics, or other criminal activities.
  
  U.S. foreign policy dictates how OFAC enforces these sanctions. OFAC targets those nations, organizations, and individuals who are believed to pose a threat to either the national security or the economic prosperity of the United States. OFAC is empowered to enforce these sanctions by legislation and can also act if given national emergency powers by the President to freeze assets that are under the United States’ jurisdiction. The United Nations’ mandates are also influential in OFAC’s sanctions, and many of the sanctions are enforced with assistance from allied nations. OFAC serves as the international community’s enforcer, because it uses trade sanctions to influence and persuade the targeted communities to either alter or halt a dangerous or denounced behavior. The sanctions make it much more difficult for those that are targeted to continue their endeavors because it disrupts their economic activities.
  
  For example, if a group is funding their terrorist activities via a specific item being sold on the international market, sanctions could be created to target that item and eliminate it as a source of revenue for the terrorist group.
  
  OFAC sanctions have targeted Iran, North Korea, and Russia among others. OFAC has also used its power to act against individuals who are known to be involved in illicit activities by freezing assets and blocking any and all property they may own.
  
  This is an OFAC law blog. It is not intended to be used as legal advice. For further information please contact the law offices of attorney Ramona Kennedy.
  
  Ramona Kennedy (Attorney) received her Jurisprudence Doctorate in America and is a licensed attorney in California (USA). Ramona Kennedy is a member of American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA). Ramona Kennedy is fluent in English and Farsi (reading & writing) & speaks Azeri Turkish.
  
  Email: Kennedycounsel@gmail.com
  
  Phones: 13106230080 & 19496770063
  
  Imo: 13106230080 & 19496770063
  
  Telegram & WhatsApp: 19496770063
  
  Office Locations:
  
  Los Angeles (Westwood) Location
  
  -Openheimer tower
  
  10880 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1101 Los Angeles CA 90024
  
  Phone: 13106230080
  
  Orange County Locations:
  
  Irvine:
  
  -7700 Irvine Center Dr. Suite 800, Irvine, CA 92618
  
  Newport Beach:
  
  -5000 Birch St, Suite 3000 Newport Beach CA 92660
  
  Phone: 19496770063
  
  Posted in OFAC | 0 Comments | Tagged #businesslawyer, #farsispeakinglawyer, #OFAC
← Older posts
- Search for:
- Contact Our Office
  
  Email: Kennedycounsel@gmail.com
  
  Phones: 19496770063 & 13106230080
  
  Telegram: 19496770063
  
  Farsi Telegram Channel:
  
  https://t.me/USA_LAWYER
  
  WhatsApp: 19496770063
  
  Imo: 19496770063
  
  Office Locations:
  Los Angeles (Westwood) Location
  -Oppenheimer tower
  10880 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 1100, 11th Floor, Los Angeles CA 90024
  Phone: 13106230080
  
  Orange County Locations:
  -7700 Irvine Center Dr. Suite 800, 8th Floor, Irvine, CA 92618 Phone: 19496770063
  
  -5000 Birch St, Suite 3000, 3rd Floor Newport Beach CA 92660
  Phone: 19496770063
- Blogs I Follow
- Follow Blog via Email
  
  Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
- Categories

Best Lawyer USA

Author Archives: kennedylawblog

Paths to Citizenship

Posted at 9:18 pm by kennedylawblog, on August 15, 2019

Why Delist from OFAC Blocked List? Financial institutions listed in Designated Block List of US department of Treasury, OFAC List may potentially be charged with Conspiracy as they have facilitated prohibited acts or criminal actions threatening US security.

Posted at 11:52 pm by kennedylawblog, on August 5, 2019

Calculating the Amount Needed for Investment in U.S. EB-5 Green Cards

Posted at 10:09 pm by kennedylawblog, on July 31, 2019

Why interests acquired under Duress in California are reversible?

Posted at 10:13 pm by kennedylawblog, on July 29, 2019

Understanding OFAC

Posted at 10:52 pm by kennedylawblog, on July 24, 2019

Contact Our Office

Blogs I Follow

Follow Blog via Email

Categories